I use very specific social networks where I belong.
- Twitter is for fun, I find great people with whom I get connected, even if we did, for the most ever met. That said, I do not despair do know some of them one day, for real, IRL, flesh and bones, all that. My profile is public, just wants to follow him, read my nonsense and strokes or heart rant, my state of mind in 140 characters. Moreover, to follow me, there is : @ _manion .
- Facebook is the exact opposite: it is reserved exclusively for people I know in real life, it is locked to death. No chance for a stranger, even someone with whom I regularly exchange but virtually, to appear in my Friends list. And you can look, you will not find me (or else it will be a homonym).
- Viadeo now. My contact list is a mix of 2 above. I accept that list in my people I know in real life, with few exceptions, including twitteriens with whom I could exchange a minimum. Hence the response I made today an illustrious unknown:
Hello Thank you for your request for linking.
I agree in general that the people I already know where I've met at least once. Indeed, despite the "fashion" of social networks where it is fashionable to have a maximum of "contacts" of "friends" of "followers" or any other documentation, I remain very attached to the personal dimension.
It does not seem that we have met, and even if we have a common touch, I'll wait until we start to interact before accepting your request for linking.
This is by no means any pride or snobbery on my part, just the desire to control the information that I can distribute and that I can distribute them.
Regards.
is not too bad, right? I do not want that can do the zoubabs relationship between my "digital identity" (as I do not like that) and my real identity. Or in any case, I do not want to make it easier for whoever wants to match 2.
PS: The last network that I joined is Quora, and for now, I stay in an observation phase to understand the value and meaning.
0 comments:
Post a Comment