John Cena Blogger Templates

them my love

I wrote recently that I was for nuclear, which, admittedly, not a technology is very popular these days, much less a opinion in the air. I will not proselytize pro-nuclear, everyone thinks what he wants.

However, I would like to understand how to do without this technology. We are told of electric cars-want-you-in-here, the number of homes equipped with all electric (hot water heating) increases visibly, so that when the thermometer violently down a bit, it verges on Apocalypse energy in Britain. How can we feed all this without increasing production, and how can we increase production without nuclear power?

Wind, solar, tidal and so on, that's fine, go on, but we also know that it is sadly inadequate. Incidentally, wind, everybody is for, but only if it is in others, you only see the appeal filed by blockages and residents' associations to limit settlements

... Continue the current average is traditional only choice I do not understand. Right now, I work for a supplier of thermal power plants. A thermal power plant, they are generators, large diesel engines that drive dynamos. But really brooms, dynamos, so super mega brooms, diesel engines. Kind, it consumes 5 tonnes of diesel per hour, the beast, or about 5900 liters / hour. Engines like that, it takes 12 to rotate the (relatively small) plant, a consumption of 71,000 liters / hour to run at full power.

71,000 liters / hour of diesel!

I think that's unconsciousness continue like that, quite simply. Besides the fact that has much longer to take advantage of our oil discharges into the atmosphere of this animal pollute the immediate environment of the residents of this facility. It's a shame, it is intended to be implanted in some of the most guns on the planet. The inhabitants of these areas can now enjoy all the different flavors of exhaust gases. And in addition to pollute the surrounding environment, be generous, it also pollutes the environment itself.

So, obviously, nuclear = dangerous disposable waste, we should bury it in concrete things we know in advance moderately reliable. But you think the current waste of thermal power plants or coal is recoverable? Ah yes, the form of sulfur, acid rain ... This is obviously not a reason, but all technologies have their counterparts, more or less blameless. Hey, someone concerned about the pollution that causes extraction of lithium to manufacture batteries for electric cars, so-called green cars? Or that caused by the manufacture of solar panels, the Eldorado production sustainable?

• pollution in manufacturing: some studies claim that the energy used to manufacture the cells [solar panels] is never pay for itself during the 20 years of production,

• The same end of life [between 20 and 25]: the cell recycling poses environmental problems.

Source

71,000 l / h . Since I calculated this figure maddening, I special affection for enriched uranium.